The UN global warming summit in Copenhagen at the end of 2009 was
meant to be a climate coronation. It turned out to be a funeral. Thanks
in part to the fact that the U.S. was unable to come up with its own
climate legislation in time, hopes were already dim for a global deal on
carbon at Copenhagen. But once the meeting commenced, things went
downhill fast. The conference was a logistical nightmare, with crowds
pressing outside the Danish capital's Bella Center, which was filled
beyond capacity. There were angry protests in the streets, but stasis
inside the conference center, with negotiations dragging on for days
with little progress. Developing countries complained that they were
being shut out of the talks, even though their citizens would suffer the
worst effects of climate change.
Not until President Barack Obama
and scores of other world leaders arrived at the end the summit was a
last-minute consolation deal clinched — with a vague agreement to keep
the global temperature rise to less than 2°C — but one that fell far
below the expectations of environmentalists.
How much do these conventions cost? Could the money be better spent on targetted solutions ... not matter how small, it spending money on transportation and food and air-condition and see practically no resluts
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment